Norwich Township · Explain yourself
One road cancelled. Which roads come first?
Council cancelled the $345,000 Firehall Road conversion. Residents deserve the replacement priorities, their costs and the reason each road makes the cut.
See the decision.
Two Council decisions
Conversion authorized · March 24
Conversion authorized · March 24
$345,000 project cancelled · April 14
Pick a plan. Explain the trade-off.
What would you choose?
Choices to question · not a public vote or a list of approved projects.
Proposal: repair existing surfaces first
What it could achievePut renewal and road condition at the centre of the project list.
The trade-offSome gravel routes wait longer for conversion; publish which ones and the maintenance cost.
Proposal: convert selected gravel roads
What it could achieveTarget named routes where traffic, drainage and lifetime costs justify conversion.
The trade-offThe same budget may leave less for renewal elsewhere. Name the deferred work.
Proposal: phase a mixed road program
What it could achieveSequence urgent renewal and a limited set of conversions.
The trade-offMore stages can extend disruption and create cost escalation; publish the sequence and contingency.
Same issue. Same opportunity to explain.
Where do they stand?
Which road standard, project list and funding plan will actually be delivered?
9 people
Their public position
Highlights gravel-road surfacing and the difficulty of funding asset maintenance as replacement costs rise.
Jim Palmer: 2026 candidate profileMore context & statements
Position reported by Heart FM; no complete project schedule, cost or service target is stated.
Earlier position: Voted for directing staff to prepare asset and ten-year road capital plans based on best-practice lifecycle maintenance.
Norwich Council minutes · July 8, 2025Full position & history
Their public position
Points to the road-conversion program as progress on gravel-road maintenance concerns that drew him into council.
Adrian Couwenberg: 2026 candidate profileMore context & statements
His account of council progress as reported by Heart FM; it does not establish sole responsibility or independently measured savings.
Supports long-term investment in Township roads and bridges as part of maintaining core municipal infrastructure.
Adrian Couwenberg campaignEarlier position: Voted against directing staff to prepare asset and ten-year road capital plans based on best-practice lifecycle maintenance.
Norwich Council minutes · July 8, 2025Full position & history
Their public position
Supports continuing gravel-road paving and traffic calming in areas where speeding is a concern.
Lynne DePlancke: 2026 candidate profileMore context & statements
Candidate priority reported by Heart FM; no project list, cost or completion schedule is stated.
Earlier position: Voted for directing staff to prepare asset and ten-year road capital plans based on best-practice lifecycle maintenance.
Norwich Council minutes · July 8, 2025Full position & history
Their public position
Identifies deteriorating roads and infrastructure improvements as needs accompanying population growth in Norwich Township.
Shawn Gear: 2026 candidate profileMore context & statements
No named project, cost or delivery timetable is supplied.
Earlier position: Voted for directing staff to prepare asset and ten-year road capital plans based on best-practice lifecycle maintenance.
Norwich Council minutes · July 8, 2025Full position & history
Their public position
Supports road hard-surfacing but would consider delaying it to preserve essential services without a large tax increase.
Karl Toews: 2026 candidate questionnaireMore context & statements
Candidate response hosted by advocacy publisher Stand4Oxford. His cited budget figures are not independently verified here.
Earlier position: Voted for directing staff to prepare asset and ten-year road capital plans based on best-practice lifecycle maintenance.
Norwich Council minutes · July 8, 2025Full position & history
Their public position
Prioritizes preventative maintenance of roads, bridges, drainage, parks and public facilities to avoid costlier repairs.
Marius Kerkhoff campaignMore context & statements
Candidate-authored priority; no costed project sequence is established.
Full position & history
No people match both filters. Choose Everyone or All positions.
An absent public answer is not a refusal. Delivery and responses are recorded on the public question.
Open the full candidate comparisonOpen public question
Put the question to them.
Which road standard, project list and funding plan will actually be delivered?
The record stays here
What happened. What happens next.
Two conversions authorized
Council authorized Beaconsfield and Substation conversions; later costing and construction details were requested.
Firehall Road conversion cancelled
Resolution 22 cancelled the 2025 project listed at $345,000.
Check the latest Council agendas for the updated road plan, costing, awards and completion reports. No new completion date is confirmed here.
Meetings & agendasOpen the documents
April 14 Council minutes · Resolution 22March 24 Council minutes · Resolution 6Current Norwich agendas and minutesTownship and County road responsibilitiesThe full issue recordCorrect this page or add a sourceGot a stronger alternative?
Name the change. Show what it costs. Explain what it gives up.
Put your idea forward